Blog Archives

IGUS Slider Review & Footage

So after finally catching up on my entire life, I had time to edit together the slider footage I took quite some time ago. I used FCPX also to start learning it.


Some of the shots are a little be shaky because I was the only one operating the camera so I was simultaneously sliding and panning or focusing. Even these shots though came out very acceptable in my opinion.

IGUS vs. Opteka

I had and returned the Opteka 47″ Slider. The slider itself was not bad, but I just don’t think it could handle the weight of my camera. Thanks to info from Oliviatech I found the ready to go IGUS. The purchased the IGUS W1080-B. This version comes with pre-tapped holes which is great, although I did add some washers to the end so that it would not slide off. The IGUS slider is about double the width that the Opteka was. This distributes the weight of the camera more evenly and allows for a much smoother slide. There was no comparison, the sliding was much easier and more consistent with the IGUS over the Opteka. The IGUS is a bit shorter at just over 3 ft, but 3 ft is plenty of length. The 47″ was actually very difficult to maneuver, and needed more than one tripod to use. I used the IGUS with just one tripod for all of the tests using some techniques described at CheesyCam. I do, however, miss the feet that went on the Opteka they were a very nice addition. Although CheesyCam points to a DIY Solutions for this. Another plus about the IGUS is that it comes with a very tiny allen wrench to adjust the tension.

Number & Letters

There are a few different IGUS models for sale on amazon. It can be confusing as to what is what, and why some are more expensive. They all start with a W, the numbers following dictate the Width of the slider. The 1040 is 2.9″ the 1080 is 4.2″ and the 16 is 4.1.” Now wait a second, the 16 is the most expensive, but thinner than the 1080. The 16 offers 16mm bearings (the size of the rail is slides on) where the other two offer 10mm bearings. The letters at the end stand for what it comes with (is it pre drilled, hand clamp, etc.) A= nothing, just the slider. B=Pre-drilled/tapped. C= no holes, but a hand clamp to adjust tension. All of this information can be found at their website, but it is confusing on amazon.


Everybody who can afford a Konova slider has one. This is the next step down in sliders and I think it is the best of its price range. I eventually want to add a pulley system to this to get very smooth slides. Compared to the Opteka Slider this is a no brainer, much more stable for larger cameras. I have not used any of the other ones on the market, but all of the ones in a close price range are friction based sliders except for the Juiced Link slider. The Juiced Link slider is new and looked pretty interesting. I do not think that it is as practical as the IGUS though because you cannot easily mount to a tripod.

Opteka 47″ Slider First Glance/Review


So, There are a number of cheap or DIY sliders out there available to DSLR filmmakers. On the more expensive end you have the Konova Sliders. Which offer roller bearing sliders which should create a smoother glide and handle more weight. On the cheap end you have the Opteka Sliders. These sliders do not have roller bearings sliders, but are similar the to popular IGUS slider tracks that many DIYers (yes, now that is a word) have tapped holes into with a drill press to make it into a slider. The Opteka ones are very similar, and at around the same price (plus free shipping if you have amazon prime) this would be the best budget option because they are already drilled. There is also the Motion Sliders, which are a tad more expensive. Indie system also has a wide range of sliders from $99 to over $400. Phew, that’s a lot of options. I decided to go with the Opteka because of the price point even with a 47″ inch rail.


So, I have only really used the slider for a few hours, but I am pretty happy with it so far. I was initially disappointed because I was not able to attach it to my Ravelli bowl mount tripod. Or at least I thought I wasn’t. I had initially wanted to mount the slider onto the sticks and use the fluid Head on the slider. That was a no go, because the only way to attach a head on top of the slider is via the 1/4″ screw, or use the 3/8″ adapter it comes with. Of course I could have figured some way to make it work the way I had originally thought, but I came across this article on CheesyCam. Basically, this was a better solutions to sliders, using two heads gives you so many more options for interesting shots with a slider (probably even able to recreate some Jib movements). Of course, I do not own another fluid head so I think I will order this one. In the mean time, I mounted the slider onto my tripod (via sliding plate) and I mounted an extra manfrotto sliding mount (going to be used for a DIY glidecam, eventually) onto the slider. I did not want to mount the screw in the slider directly to my camera, I was afraid I would strip the threads in my camera because you need to tighten the screw with an allen wrench, and it seemed finicky to me, but that is just me. Either way this was limiting because the Camera was stuck static and I could only get the plate tight in one direction (more on that later).

Unfortunately, I did not spend too much time with the slider. It was also over 100 degrees outside today. Anyways, I am positive I can get better slides out of this slider (than in the video below) for a few reasons.

1) Balance: Because I could not get the slide plate facing the right way on top of the slider, I could not Balance the weight of the camera, this would make slides much easier.

2) Practice: It is not easy having a consistant slide, especially with how long the slider is. This is only the first hour that I had it, I feel once I practice I will get nice slides. I was also trying many different ways to slide: using the camera, holding onto the base, using the camera straps, etc.

3) Mounting: For some of the shots, I had it on the tripod, and well, the slider is a little too big for just one tripod to support. When the camera (Canon 60D) reaches either end, the tripod begins to tilt, even though it is fully locked. Of course you could mount it on the tripod the other way, so that the slider would not be in line with the tilt axis, but then the sliding plate interferes with the slider.

4) Camera Strap: I attached the camera strap when I got my camera, and haven’t removed it since, this was a very big pain while I was doing these tests because I was focusing on that some of the time.


This is some of the best footage a shot today.

I thought it was important to use different lenses, because not only do they balance the camera different, the focal length has a huge impact on how shaky the footage will be. I used the tamron just to see how much it really shook. The last clip was probably at over 200mm (and that lens does not have any kind of stabilization). I was kind of surprised though, because if you added some stabilization to that last clip I think it could be usable.

I think that the “Nifty Fifty” footage came out the best overall (this lens does not have an stabilization either, although the 18-135 does). I believe this is because it is not a very far focal length (sometimes I was zoomed further than 50mm with the (18-135) and because the lens is much smaller, so not only is the camera ligher, but it is more balanced. I was even able to get a decent dolly in on the coffee mug (did about 6 or 7 takes). I was surprised at this because I was focusing on racking the focus as well as keeping the slide smooth.

Overall, the slider build quality is very nice, it feels strong. There are holes every so often so that you can use the provided allen wrench to adjust the mounting screw and mount a camera or tripod head. There are also three places on the tripod to mount to a tripod  (all with both 1/4″ and 3/8th threads). 47″ is long, it is just a bit to large to mount onto one tripod, I would recommend using two tripods with this, or go with the smaller version. The length is nice to have, you are never limited to a short slide. The sliding itself is pretty smooth, there are a few rough spots, but I think with a little use they will wear in, they are hardly noticeable.

The Good:

-Cheap Price Point

-Can achieve smooth slides

-47″ gives you plenty of slide

-Multiple places to mount a tripod

The Bad

-No roller bearings, less smooth and handles less weight than sliders such as the konova.

-Needs more than one tripod to use the full length. (at least I would recommend using two).

-Will not always get a perfect slide. It will take practice to get a nice slide.